A braid was held up as a trophy. Not to win a fight, but to humiliate a woman after death. The camera mattered, because the point was never only the act. The point was the message.
In January 2026, Kurdish and regional outlets reported footage of a man holding up a severed braid and claiming it was taken from a Kurdish female fighter from the Women’s Protection Units (YPJ) after her death. Rudaw reported that some sources identified the man, but it could not independently verify that identification. That caution is the correct standard. If we care about women’s dignity, we should also care about truth.
Then came the reply. Women began braiding their hair on camera and sharing it in defiance. bianet described the campaign spreading rapidly, moving from social media into public life. The message was simple: you can cut one braid, but you cannot cut what it stands for.
Strip away rumour and the core facts still hold.
A braid was cut from a dead woman and displayed as a trophy in filmed mockery. That is not incidental cruelty. It is humiliation made performative.
The backlash was equally clear. Kurdish women, and allies beyond Kurdish communities, braided their hair as a public refusal. In parts of north east Syria, protests were also reported where women braided one another’s hair in solidarity.
To outsiders, this can look like a gesture. In Kurdish life, a braid carries meaning.
A museum feature on Kurdish visual culture notes that intricately braided hair is commonly worn with traditional dress, particularly around Newroz, and it records older mourning practices where women cut off braids at gravesites. Braids can hold pride, memory and grief in a single thread.
Rudaw also reports a Kurdish researcher describing the braid as culturally significant, and in recent history a symbol of female power and resistance. That matters, because it explains the intent behind the trophy. If you want to degrade someone, you target what they value, not what is replaceable.
Humiliation is used because it travels.
A killing ends a life. A trophy aims to control the living. It is designed to do three things at once: dehumanise the victim, warn other women, and reward cruelty with status.
The filming is not a side detail. The camera turns degradation into propaganda. It spreads fear without a single extra act of violence.
That is why the Kurdish braid protest landed so powerfully. It interrupted the intended lesson. It refused to carry shame on the victim’s behalf.
In UK safeguarding, so called honour based abuse is not one offence. It is a context where violence, threats, intimidation, coercion, or abuse are used to enforce a code of behaviour and defend perceived “honour”.
The braid trophy sits on the same continuum. The setting is war, but the mechanism is familiar: a woman’s body is used to police other women, and public shaming is used to enforce obedience through fear.
That is why “dishonour abuse” fits. There is no honour in public degradation. There is only power claiming the right to humiliate.
International humanitarian law does not treat humiliation as a footnote.
Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions prohibits “outrages upon personal dignity”, including “humiliating and degrading treatment”.
The International Committee of the Red Cross also sets out how the Rome Statute includes “committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment” as a war crime provision.
The legal language is direct for a reason. Dignity is not decoration. In conflict, humiliation is often used to terrorise communities and to erase the humanity of the dead. The ICRC’s International Review has examined this specifically in relation to “outrages against the personal dignity of the dead”.
Solidarity matters. However, it has to be smart, otherwise it amplifies the original harm.
The footage tried to make shame contagious. The response made defiance contagious instead. That is the difference between propaganda and solidarity.
It is a wave of solidarity where women braid their hair in defiance after footage showed a braid cut from a dead Kurdish YPJ fighter and displayed as a trophy.
Because braids can carry identity, tradition and memory. When they are cut by force, it signals an attack on dignity, not just a body.
Because humiliation spreads fear quickly. It turns violence into a message aimed at controlling the living through shame.
Common Article 3 prohibits outrages upon personal dignity, including humiliating and degrading treatment. The Rome Statute also includes related provisions.
Do not share the trophy footage. Share the braid response, explain your reason, and support credible work that protects women and girls.
Aneeta Prem is a UK safeguarding campaigner and founder of Freedom Charity. She provides media comment on forced marriage, FGM, dishonour based abuse, and gendered coercion and control.
Media enquiries: https://www.aneeta.com/contact
Rudaw (22 Jan 2026): Kurdish women braid hair in protest of brutality
https://www.rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/22012026
bianet (Jan 2026): Desecration sparks hair braiding campaign
https://bianet.org/english
ICRC: Rome Statute, Article 8 (outrages upon personal dignity)
https://www.icrc.org/en/document/article-8-statute-international-criminal-court
ICRC International Review: War crime of outrages against personal dignity of the dead
https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/the-war-crime-of-outrages-against-the-personal-dignity-of-the-dead-929
Common Article 3 text (ICRC PDF)
https://elearning.icrc.org/detention/en/story_content/external_files/Article%203%20common%20GC%20%281949%29.pdf
CPS: What is ‘honour’-based abuse and harmful practices?
https://www.cps.gov.uk/types-crime/violence-against-women-and-girls/honour-based-abuse/what-honour-based-abuse-and-harmful-practices
CPS legal guidance: Identifying and flagging SCHBA and forced marriage
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/so-called-honour-based-abuse-and-forced-marriage-guidance-identifying-and-flagging
College of Policing: Honour-based abuse guidance overview
https://www.college.police.uk/guidance/major-investigation-and-public-protection/honour-based-abuse/honour-based-abuse-guidance-overview
Capacity, Consent and Dishonour Abuse: Why “no capacity means no consent” is the safeguard the world is still failing to apply
Trigeminal neuralgia is the most painful condition in the world. So what is Trigeminal Neuralgia ?
A clear, UK-focused guide to how doctors have understood and treated trigeminal neuralgia over three centuries, and why that history still matters for patients, families and clinicians today.
AI abuse in schools is now a safeguarding issue. Pupil photographs can still celebrate achievement, confidence and school life, but the risk has changed. Images shared on websites, newsletters and social media can now be copied, altered, sexualised or used in blackmail attempts. The answer is not to erase children from public life. The answer is better consent, safer image use, regular review and stronger safeguarding judgment.
The Aneeta Prem A to Z Framework on Mental Health, Facial Pain and Quality of Life
What the 2025 forced marriage figures reveal about children, capacity and delayed intervention