There is no honour in these crimes.
Why are we using the term Honour Based Violence?
Because it’s convenient, because everyone else does or because we just can’t think of another way of describing these horrendous human rights abuses that affect the most vulnerable in our society?
We are talking about forced marriage, female genital mutilation and breast ironing offences that lead to people being serially raped, mutilated and in some sad cases ultimately murdered.
10 years ago I started to use the term Dishonour Based Violence – even though I don’t believe this is strong enough.
Freedom charity submitted an Early Day Motion in 2010 calling for forced marriage to become a crime and the term Dishonour to be adopted. We are really just talking about rape, murder and child abuse, but strangely we are all falling over ourselves to be politically correct.
There is no honour involved. Using the term honour — as in honour based violence or HBV — impedes victims to come forward and report these hideous crimes. This is because many victims believe their families are inflicting this type of abuse on them to protect their family honour. They consider “honour” is more important than the happiness, well-being and love of their own children.
At many conferences I have chaired, or been the keynote speaker at – I have challenged the language. In 98% of cases the audience — made up of professionals such as doctors, teachers and lawyers — have agreed. Only two people have disagreed with altering the language because they were told they had to follow police procedure.
Victims and survivors want the language changed and in my opinion, continuing to use the term HBV is beyond ridiculous. Using the right language is imperative if we are to change the hearts and minds of perpetuators and their victims.
The prime-minister, David Cameron, the NPCC police lead, the Home Secretary and others — I’m pleased to say — are now using the term Dishonour Based Violence.
But its only when we acknowledge how it is so damaging and leads to such horrendous abuses that we will all have the confidence to challenge the language and bring an end to this hideous crime.
If we stand united in this belief, then let’s change the language today.
Lee Milne's sentencing in Scotland is a legal milestone. More importantly, it forces the law and the public to face a truth survivors have long understood: coercive control can be fatal, even where the perpetrator did not physically commit the final act.
The UK now describes forced marriage, FGM and so-called honour-based abuse more accurately than before. But the law still struggles to prosecute how these crimes often happen in real life: through family pressure, community enforcement, fear, shame and collective control.
The World Health Organisation has marked World Health Day 2026 under the theme “Together for health. Stand with science.” It is a timely message. But health is not only about medicine. It is also about whether people can live safely, speak freely and make choices without fear.
The March 2026 safeguarding update makes one thing harder to deny: forced marriage and FGM belong inside mainstream child protection. The question now is whether institutions can act early enough to prevent harm.
Noelia Castillo Ramos died in Barcelona on 26 March 2026 after a long legal battle over her right to euthanasia. Her death will reignite debate over assisted dying. The deeper human rights question is what failed her long before the final decision.
Female genital mutilation reconstruction UK, NHS pathway for FGM survivors, clitoral reconstruction UK, FGM survivor care UK, Women and Equalities Committee FGM reconstruction